From: Martin Str|mberg Message-Id: <200106091636.SAA03323@mother.ludd.luth.se> Subject: Re: .files on servers are perceived as readonly To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 18:36:04 +0200 (MEST) In-Reply-To: <3B2207A2.AC9FB825@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Jun 09, 2001 12:25:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk According to Richard Dawe: > Martin Str|mberg wrote: > > By the way there seems to be a bug here (it's my own compiled ls so > > perhaps not the latest): > > Is your version built against CVS? If it's built against djdev203, did you > apply the opendir.c patch? It's built with some version of cvs. I don't remember which day it was I rebuilt fileutils so some unknow state of cvs. > > > ls -agl v:/martin/djgpp/djgpp/src/libc/ > > total 0 > > ----d- 96 Jun 8 23:10 cvs > > > > Is it supposed to bahave like that? > > How were you expecting it to behave? At least list v:/martin/djgpp/djgpp/src/libc/ or everything in that directory, not just cvs. > I tried it with stock Fileutils 4.0 (built against 2.03) and the > symlink-enabled version I uploaded yesterday and I more than one file > listed, when doing an 'ls -agl' against my copy of djgpp/src/libc/. > > > Plus a bug in the docs. They say "The '-g' option is accepted but > > ignored, for compatiblity with Unix." in the ls node. > > I couldn't find '-g' in the Fileutils docs, but Unix98 says this: > > "-g The same as -l, except that the owner is not written." > > Presumably the bug is that it does take noticed of '-g'. If so, I will > submit a patch to Jim Meyering. It looks like our -- err, _my_ fileutils report the DOZE attributes. Right, MartinS