Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:55:00 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: file append problem
In-Reply-To: <3B1C2D60.31887.5DA06F@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010605085213.27602C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> I also wonder if the _remove_on_close member in FILE could be eliminated too 
> since that functionality duplicates the O_TEMPORARY flag.

Probably.  But we should decide what to do with this flag if someone 
calls dup or dup2 or freopen.