From: "Tim Van Holder" To: Subject: Re: [patch] Second draft: a64l and l64a Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:11:49 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <7458-Mon04Jun2001213334+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Thanks. Now that I _really_ see the text, I have a few more minor > comments: > > [snip: TeXinfo formatting suggestions] Will do. > > This function takes a @code{long} argument and returns a pointer to its > > radix-64 representation. Negative numbers are not supported. > > @c FIXME: Supporting negative values (or at least unsigned longs) seems > > @c more logical; should we be POSIX-compliant here? > > You can now remove that FIXME, and instead say what did your code do > with negative values. Right - this was an oversight. > > diff -rN emptydir/makefile src/libc/posix/stdlib/makefile > > 0a1,7 > > > # Copyright (C) 2001 DJ Delorie, see COPYING.DJ for details > > > > > > TOP=../.. > > > > > > SRC += a64l.c l64a.c > > I think we normally put only one file on a line. DJ, is that a > standard we should enforce? I'll change this as well.