Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:36:27 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id: <9003-Mon04Jun2001213626+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOCCDAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: Fileutils 4.0 released
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOCCDAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:00:09 +0200
> 
> How about adding a recommendation (to the FAQ, or the KB, or
> wherever appropriate) that executables be compressed with UPX?

UPX has its own stub, and I'm not sure how well would it work.  What
happens when a new DJGPP version is released with a modified stub--is
UPX updated right there and then?  Does it even need to be?