Message-ID: <02de01c0e748$e9bfda20$0100a8c0@fibertel.com.ar>
From: "Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com>
To: <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <3B1225A1 DOT 13201 DOT 10ADCE AT localhost>
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.3 can't built itself?
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 04:36:29 -0300
Organization: nBens@ Computers
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

>
> Haven't met anything similar however I used binutils-2.9.1 (not 2.11) to
> build gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP (otherwise -mno-bnu210 would be useless
> as I should get gcc binaries incompatible with binutils 2.[89].*)
>
> One more difference is that I build gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP under Linux
> (native building is less tested this time but it worked for me at least
> once)
>
> I suggest to rerun stage3 after adding -save-temps to CFLAGS and
> inspect assembler output near failure
>

Ok, how do I rerun stage3? build.bat does the whole process again...