Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:36:17 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-Id: <3791-Tue22May2001213616+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, alain AT qnx DOT com In-reply-to: <3B097A2A.F951217D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard Dawe on Mon, 21 May 2001 21:27:22 +0100) Subject: Re: snprintf? References: <3B081813 DOT B83F96D3 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <8011-Mon21May2001063252+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B097A2A DOT F951217D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:27:22 +0100 > From: Richard Dawe > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > Richard Dawe wrote: > > > > > > Anyhow, please find below a diff against latest CVS sources with these > > > changes. > [snip] > > > OK to commit? > > > > Yes. Thanks. > > I committed the snprintf() patch. I also committed the fix to > tests/libc/ansi/stdio/hello.c. It doesn't compile for me. It looks like you didn't commit changes to the system headers (stdio.h, I guess), so the prototypes for the new functions aren't visible to the compiler.