Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 06:32:52 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <8011-Mon21May2001063252+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B081813.B83F96D3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sun, 20 May 2001 20:16:36 +0100)
Subject: Re: snprintf?
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010520182619 DOT 23429H-100000 AT is> <3B081813 DOT B83F96D3 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:16:36 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Anyhow, please find below a diff against latest CVS sources with these
> changes.
> 
> The new width tests are at the end of tests/libc/ansi/stdio/tsnprtf.c; the
> _doprntf() fail test is tests/libc/ansi/stdio/tsnprtf2.c. I also made
> vsnprintf() zero the FILE structure before filling it in.
> 
> OK to commit?

Yes.  Thanks.