Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 10:12:52 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id: <3099-Sat19May2001101252+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, snowball3 AT softhome DOT net
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEGBCDAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: Possible bash issue
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEGBCDAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 01:30:14 +0200
> 
> > In other words, to be effective, this test should invoke some other
> > DJGPP program, not a shell.  (But perhaps someone should actually step
> But what external program could you call (portably!) that would still
> allow such a deduction to be made?  I think I'll just lower the loop
> limit and be done with it.

If you are doing something DJGPP-specific, simply bypass the test and
make it come up with 14KB or some such.