X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:06:21 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
Message-ID: <20010511130621.B1838@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
References: <20010508142430 DOT N23521 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010509132856 DOT 19857O-100000 AT is> <20010509093658 DOT C27959 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <9743-Wed09May2001190506+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010511105129 DOT A1794 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <7048-Fri11May2001200622+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <7048-Fri11May2001200622+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:06:23PM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: > Indeed, it seems that any DJGPP+DOS-specific LFN utility would be free
-: > to define its own `standards', provided the LFN API reports the right
-: > information.  Just thinking out loud, now, I'm wondering about some sort
-: > scheme for FAT<-->inode mapping....
-: 
-: Sorry, you lost me with the last sentence.  How is that relevant to
-: the issue we were discussing?

I was just thinking about storing LFN entries on disk as inode-ish
structures instead of using empty directory entries....