Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:18:38 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id: <7704-Fri11May2001131837+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3AF7F5C9.2579.B706AF@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: snprintf?
References: <3AF7358B DOT 19349 DOT 38937B AT localhost> <3AF7F5C9 DOT 2579 DOT B706AF AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Sorry for a delay in replying to this.  I needed to refresh my memory
about past discussions, and had trouble finding the time for that.

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:34:01 -0400
> 
> > > > * n == 0 handled properly now. The buffer pointer in FILE is set to NULL
> > > > in this case, to catch bogus buffer accesses.
> > 
> > This last issue is what bothered me.
> 
> It worked for me when I traced a sample program through with rhide. It 
> returned the right size and it didn't crash. The only place where I couldn't 
> completely trace through was the PUTC macro call.

After reading the discussions we had, there are a couple of minor
issues that I'd like to see resolved:

  - test the case of n = 1 in the test program;
  - test the case of errors in format conversions (anything that
    causes _doprnt return -1).

Other than that, I think the last version posted can go in.