From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id: <200105091638.SAA19410@mother.ludd.luth.se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:38:29 +0200 (MEST)
In-Reply-To: <20010509093658.C27959@kendall.sfbr.org> from "JT Williams" at May 09, 2001 09:36:58 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

According to JT Williams:
> Nope, it's done unconditionally for all long file names.  Bill completely
> discarded the MICROS~1 kludge.  If you unload the TSR, any LFNs you've
> created will appear as SFNs using the upper 128 chars.  It was weird at
> first, but I soon agreed with Bill that it was preferable to MICROS~1.

Does that mean the file names are gibberish? Can you show us some
examples how the SFN looks?


Right,

						MartinS