From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 17:52:51 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Cc: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
Message-ID: <20010509175251.A352@lauras.lt>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
References: <200105072211 DOT SAA25769 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is> <20010508091744 DOT B23521 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3405-Tue08May2001175703+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
In-Reply-To: <3405-Tue08May2001175703+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 05:57:04PM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > I believe LFN support for plain DOS is critical, and long overdue.
> 
> Please explain why do you think so, especially given the fact (or
> rather my estimate) that the number of plain DOS users nowadays should
> be insignificant.  Even though I'm one of them.

How much time did you spend on supporting build of your packages on SFN?
My personaly experience with GCC isn't very joyful. (Hopefully I'll finish
that in late June).

Laurynas