Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 13:37:35 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: fil40s-beta2
In-Reply-To: <3AF87321.E31CEABC@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010509133644.19857S@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 8 May 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:

> I wonder why djutils.c

(You probably meant djstart.c.)

> provides an implementation of lstat() when HAVE_LSTAT is defined?

djstart.c provided lstat unconditionally.  The reason is that I simply
never considered the possibility that we will ever have true symlink
support.