Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 21:17:15 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: dj AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3028-Tue08May2001211715+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200105081451.KAA01411@envy.delorie.com> (message from DJ Delorie
	on Tue, 8 May 2001 10:51:44 -0400)
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is> <200105081451 DOT KAA01411 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 10:51:44 -0400
> From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
> > 
> > W2K should be identical to NT, I think.  (Which is not to say we
> > shouldn't improve the NT instructions ;-)
> 
> Either way, we should have a 2k-specific entry, even if it does
> exactly what NT does.

Yes, of course.  I was just saying that the information is known.