Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 10:51:44 -0400
Message-Id: <200105081451.KAA01411@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010508103514.3965P-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Tue, 8 May 2001 10:35:43 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Is it really so important, given that W2K supports the LFN API?

It would be nice to know what the story is.

> > It would be nice if we could recommend something.  The Zip Picker also
> > doesn't have instructions specific to 2k or ME (Eli is working on ME,
> > I think).
> 
> W2K should be identical to NT, I think.  (Which is not to say we
> shouldn't improve the NT instructions ;-)

Either way, we should have a 2k-specific entry, even if it does
exactly what NT does.  People don't always realize they should use the
NT instructions for 2k, or the 98 instructions for ME.