X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 09:17:44 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.04 release date
Message-ID: <20010508091744.B23521@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <200105072211 DOT SAA25769 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010508103514 DOT 3965P-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010508103514.3965P-100000@is>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:35:43AM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: > Can someone find out the status of LFN support add-ons for NT and DOS?
-: 
-: Is it really so important, given that W2K supports the LFN API?

I believe LFN support for plain DOS is critical, and long overdue.

I have only two more patches to apply to djasm.y before the stock
DJGPP djasm can be used to build Bill Currie's M$-DOG LFN TSR
(http://www.taniwha.org/lfn.zip).  I'm hoping this will encourage others
to work with Bill's LFN TSR (it's useable as is, and IMHO it won't take
much to move it to a stable beta stage).