Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 09:56:04 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <9003-Fri04May2001095604+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <10105040305.AA19355@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: win2000/ntvdm/djgpp (fwd)
References:  <10105040305 DOT AA19355 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> By the way, I believe the Win 2K results I sent are identical to the 
> NT 4 results

Yes, this is expected.  I'm not aware of any simple way to distinguish
between these two (which is probably intentional on MS part).

> but I don't believe some get PSP calls would break it...

Yes, that's what I'd think as well, but we will need to test it.

Thanks for testing.