Message-ID: <20010430051633.35911.qmail@web11304.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: DSMs and DJGPP packages
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>,
        Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>,
        Zippo Workers <zippo-workers AT egroups DOT com>,
        Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3AEC4B18.AC1B37C0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> wrote:

> > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Richard Dawe wrote:
> > 
> > > Now that zippo 0.1.3 has shipped, I would like
> to encourage people to
> > > include DSMs in any DJGPP packages they make.
> > 
> BTW the DSMs for sh-utils 2.0 call it "Shell
> Utilities". Unfortunately
> this will break upgrading from sh-utils 1.12, since
> that is called
> "sh-utils" in the DSM. What is the correct name for
> sh-utils? Is it
> sh-utils or shellutils or Shell Utilities? Whatever
> it is either me or
> Prashant will have to fix a DSM.

I personally prefer sh-utils to shellutils. I think
it's more widely known that way. I'll fix that in my
2.0.11 release. Thanks for the note.

Prashant

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/