Sender: rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk Message-ID: <3AEC4B18.AC1B37C0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:10:48 +0100 From: Richard Dawe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: DJGPP workers , Zippo Workers , Prashant TR Subject: Re: DSMs and DJGPP packages References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Richard Dawe wrote: > > > Now that zippo 0.1.3 has shipped, I would like to encourage people to > > include DSMs in any DJGPP packages they make. > > I thought most of the packages already have a DSM. Don't they? 90 DSMs exist in the 553 ZIPs in my mirror of the DJGPP archive. The zippo source tree contains 145 DSMs. Some of these are duplicates - I've updated some DSMs in the zippo source tree. I'm pretty sure I've told the authors of the updated DSMs, so that they can include them in their next release. Maybe we should move the DSMs from the zippo source tree into the actual package files? The DSMs can be viewed from the web - no need to look in zippo CVS: http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/zippo/dsm/ As these get incorporated into updated packages, please tell me, so that I can remove them from zippo CVS. A few source DSMs may need updates to have the correct dependencies for building, etc. BTW the DSMs for sh-utils 2.0 call it "Shell Utilities". Unfortunately this will break upgrading from sh-utils 1.12, since that is called "sh-utils" in the DSM. What is the correct name for sh-utils? Is it sh-utils or shellutils or Shell Utilities? Whatever it is either me or Prashant will have to fix a DSM. Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/