From: "The Owl" <theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:05:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: win2000/ntvdm/djgpp (fwd)
CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <3AEC65FA.12111.13D9D556@localhost>
In-reply-to: <6480-Wed25Apr2001233942+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <3AE5877C DOT 29248 DOT 5DE2385 AT localhost> (theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu)
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> So could we please talk about this some more?  Why do we need to issue
> a PM interrupt, and why do we need to use the PM selector of our PSP?
> Isn't __dpmi_int with the real-mode PSP segment good enough?

_CurrentPSPSelector is set only when a pmode int was issued, a dpmi
service 0300 or a real (v86) mode int will do nothing (for our purposes).