From: "Laurynas Biveinis" Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:59:51 +0200 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: gcc-3.0 related patches for DJGPP CVS version Message-ID: <20010429155951.A223@lauras.lt> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <20010429082104 DOT A543 AT lauras DOT lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: ; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 10:07:39AM +0300 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Can you suggest the options that you think are the best? Adding -malign-double -m128bit-long-double might help. But this should be benchmarked or something. > Should we ask the GCC maintainers for suggestions? Maybe, if they would reply. > Not necessarily: building a library could involve considerations which > don't apply to applications on a Joe Random User's machine. I mean, if there are some switches which aren't enabled by default because of ix86 ABI considerations on other platforms. > > And there are a few new interesting options, like -m128bit-long-double. > > In what version of GCC? I cannot find it anywhere in the docs of GCC > 2.95.3. 3.0+ Laurynas