Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:37:33 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be
Message-Id: <2110-Sat28Apr2001093733+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIOENMCCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Binutils 2.11 released
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIOENMCCAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:15:50 +0200
>
> objdump -g shows as filenames for the above:
> 
> E:/Tmp/foo.c
> E:/Tmp/../tmp/foo.c
> /tmp/foo.c
> e:/tmp/foo.c
> e:\tmp/foo.c
> e:\tmp\foo.c
> 
> So I cannot reproduce the bug (either with my local cvs binutils, or Mark's
> 2.11 package)
  ^^^^
This is the crucial detail: the problem I saw exists in v2.10, but is
corrected in 2.11.  (I didn't yet start using 2.11.)