X-Authentication-Warning: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de: broeker owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:07:45 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
X-Sender: broeker AT acp3bf
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
cc: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Subject: Re: sbrk() storing the size of memory blocks
In-Reply-To: <2561-Fri27Apr2001135301+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104271305040.1195-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> With Pine, it's best to include the text in the body, with the Ctrl-R
> command.  Pine automatically does TRT with end-of-line conversions.

But it breaks lines automatically on Ctrl-R, and for a patch file, that
can easily render it unusable. And the lines in this particular patch are
really quite long (crt0.S contained many lines longer than 80 chars, when
I started adding those comments).

Not even to mention that it's a bit hard to send two patches in one mail
without patch mixing them together if both are included in the main
text.

-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.