Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:17:31 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id: <3405-Tue24Apr2001201731+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        n_abing AT ns DOT roxas-online DOT net DOT ph
In-reply-to: <10104241440.AA18551@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject: Re: Fixed core dumper in dpmiexcp.c
References:  <10104241440 DOT AA18551 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 09:40:12 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> Without the size of each block you can't reliably do a dump.  To get the
> size of each block we would have to add this to the sbrk() code

Does catching Page Faults during dumping and longjmp'ing to dump the
next page sound like a possible band-aid?