Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:17:19 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Test binaries of gcc-3.0 20010314 (prerelease)
In-Reply-To: <3AC1DF7A.9994.572567@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010329111640.3269J-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> I have begun using different bin directory for such files (in my case
> $DJDIR/bin2) already for sime time. I configured gcc-3.0 snapshot
> using --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs so location of
> libstdc++ headers doesn't overlap. Only possible problem I see is
> possibility to try to link with wrong libstdcxx.a if $DJDIR/lib is explicitly
> specified in libraries search directories. For gcc-3.0 dev. version
> I put it in $DJDIR/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/3.0/

Yes, the C++ headers and libraries is another issue.  Perhaps we need
to take care of these for the next GCC release, so that several
versions could coexist.