Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:13:49 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Small patch for src/libemu/src/emu387.cc
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103271431190.16700-200000@acp3bf>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010327161009.23442A@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:

> Well, I thought I'd make what Andris sent a bit easier to digest for all
> of us, so I ran a little filter script of mine across the 4 *.log files
> contained in his .zip file to list, count, and sort the different warnings
> by message:

Thanks for the footwork.

>  152 traditional C rejects the 'u' suffix
> 
> As can be seen, the vast majority of the warnings are of the "traditional
> C rejects..." type, plus some 'deprecated' warnings probably linked to
> changes between classic ANSI/ISO C 89/90 and the new C99. 

DJ, should we remove -Wtraditional from gcc.opt?  It looks like it's 
becoming a terrible PITA, nagging left and right about legitimate code 
which will be pain to change.  (I admit that the 'u' suffix was the last 
straw.)