Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:42:23 +0100
From: Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Fetish.pm band-aid (Fileutils testsuite)
Message-ID: <20010319104223.B1585@libra.eth.ericsson.se>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010306105723 DOT 7922J-100000 AT is> <3AB4B541 DOT 2E8B3692 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <3AB4B541.2E8B3692@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>; from rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 01:16:49PM +0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 01:16:49PM +0000, Richard Dawe wrote:
> I checked that I have the latest binaries. Laszlo Molnar (or anyone else)
> - are you planning to recompile the port with DJGPP 2.03? Recompilation
> with 2.03 would solve this problem.

I'm waiting for perl 5.6.1. But I think I've uploaded a binary
distribution of 5.005_03 to CPAN some times ago which was compiled with
2.03. Too bad I forgot to upload it to dj... Sigh.

Laszlo