Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 19:46:11 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Patch for djgpp.djl
In-Reply-To: <3AB35C76.21437.248782@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.10103171941090.45574-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > To get gcc-3.0 20010314 working for DJGPP I had to modify djgpp.djl or
> > C++ applications which uses libstdcxx.a doesn't link correctly. Perhaps
> > it should not break anything with earlier versions ...  
> 
> I have no problem with the patch. Especially since it makes it more like the 
> binutils version. The patch adds handling of unique sections. Does this mean 
> that the g++ 3.0 compiler is producting unique sections without using flags 
> like '-ffunction-sections'?
> 

Seems that no.

Building libstdc++-v3 used -ffunction-sections by default (I
didn't specially tried to turn this option off and didn't look why this
option is used). Seems that this option forces us also to configure
binutils using option -enable-bfd-assembler 

Andris