Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 09:36:34 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be
Message-Id: <2427-Sat17Mar2001093634+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIKEKDCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: stubify and Windows ME
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIKEKDCBAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:44:46 +0100
> 
> But if I remove foo.exe after entering _rename(), the call still fails
> with EINVAL.
[snip]
> > There's a similar code in mkdir.c.  Could you please set LFN=n and see
> > if mkdir then also fails on Windows ME?
> Yes, it does.

Thanks for testing this.  I will remove that code from both of these
functions.

DJ, I think we should put a patched stubify.exe into djdev203.zip on
SimTel.NET after these changes: it solves problems on both Windows
2000 and ME.  More and more people are using these two versions, and I
expect the flow of FAQs reporting EINVAL to grow.