From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: stubify and Windows ME
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:37:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEJKCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3405-Wed14Mar2001200529+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I don;t have any strong feelings.  I simply assumed that Mark decided
> in bnu210b.zip to use a different directory for some good reason.
Just for the record: I don't think Mark made any such change; the path
I mentioned is what _my_ private version of binutils uses. I don't know
what the ld from Mark's package does; it probably uses a hardcoded
script. So what path it would have used if it wasn't hardcoded doesn't
matter, I think (IIRC, ld will _never_ use scripts from the path if it
has a hardcoded one (unless specifically requested by -T of course)).