From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: Fetish.pm band-aid (Fileutils testsuite)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:20:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIMEIPCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010314093335.22222C@is>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> I don't think it's wise to limit the search to %DJDIR%/bin.  We
> already look up the entire PATH in several other cases; we should do
> the same here, or else we will have another subtle incompatibility.
You're quite right.  I simply figured it would be a lot more likely
for that type of program to be in DJDIR/bin.  But then again, DJGPP
users could be using ActiveState's perl instead of the DJGPP one, so
we'd need to be able to find that on the path if given /usr/bin/perl.