From: "Tim Van Holder" To: "Eli Zaretskii" Cc: Subject: RE: stubify and Windows ME Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:28:09 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Maybe future versions of djgpp could even drop djgpp.djl entirely, > > instead using $DJDIR/lib/ldscripts/i386go32.*; this seems cleaner. > > Personally, I don't mind that, provided that the DJGPP linker scripts > in the Binutils distribution are actively maintained, and if they are > always included in bnuNNNb.zip. That would be the idea. Because they're no longer hardcoded into ld, they could be updated and distributed with djdev and/or binutils. > Note that the directory name you suggest is IIRC not where Binutils > installs the linker scripts. If we don't want the directory Binutils > uses, someone should submit a change to the maintainers in order to > force "make install" do what we want. True. The default is $prefix/$alias/lib/ldscripts, but that seemed like overkill, so I added automake conditionals to use a different path on DJGPP ($DJDIR/lib/ldscripts or /dev/env/DJDIR/lib/ldscripts, depending on DJGPP version). But that's quite an ugly hack and unlikely to be accepted into the official tree. Setting tooldir to $prefix instead of $prefix/$alias when building for DJGPP might be a better solution. Of course, if you feel having a $DJDIR/i386-pc-msdosdjgpp tree, no further change is needed (and may be useful once DJGPP is more widely used for cross-compiling (a DJ-to-mingw cross should be workable)).