Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:36:44 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Tim Van Holder <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: stubify and Windows ME
In-Reply-To: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEIKCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010314093614.22222D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Tim Van Holder wrote:

> Maybe future versions of djgpp could even drop djgpp.djl entirely,
> instead using $DJDIR/lib/ldscripts/i386go32.*; this seems cleaner.

Personally, I don't mind that, provided that the DJGPP linker scripts
in the Binutils distribution are actively maintained, and if they are
always included in bnuNNNb.zip.

Note that the directory name you suggest is IIRC not where Binutils
installs the linker scripts.  If we don't want the directory Binutils
uses, someone should submit a change to the maintainers in order to
force "make install" do what we want.