Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:20:00 -0500
Message-Id: <200103130520.AAA30074@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3AAD63C1.14365.38DA4A@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: exit handler for fd_props.c
References:  <3AAD63C1 DOT 14365 DOT 38DA4A AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> This patch adds an exit handler for those fds that have a fd_properties 
> struct associated with it. Problems or objections?

All you're doing is closing fds, right?  Why?  Do you expect close()
to delete files that are marked for deletion? (which is what I assume)

And, if we're exiting anyway, do we really need to clean up so
carefully?  It's not a bad thing, just wondering if you're expecting
something unexpected.