From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: stubify and Windows ME
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:10:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIGEHLCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <2110-Sun11Mar2001201012+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> > Oh, I noticed something annoying: running binaries (such as stubedit)
> > built in the DJGPP CVS tree crashed my system in a BIG way.  Turns out
> > this is because my gcc uses 'const' sections, and djgpp.djl doesn't put
> > them anywhere.
> 
> What are these sections?  Is your GCC based on a snapshot which added
> them?  If not, where did those sections come from?
You should know by now I like to customize my tools - I added it of
course (I think I also enabled #pragma pack, but that may also be enabled
in the stock DJGPP release of gcc).