From: Bruno Haible <haible AT ilog DOT fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15019.44290.970366.625720@honolulu.ilog.fr>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 17:51:14 +0100 (CET)
To: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gettext pretest available
In-Reply-To: <439E9106868@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
References: <343878750F9 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de>
	<439E9106868 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Juan Manuel Guerrero writes:

> If in the future,
> a GNU maintainer of GNU gettext decides to rename _LIBINTL_H or to remove
> __USE_GNU_GETTEXT at all, then DJGPP's libc.a will become
> automatically broken.

The macro __USE_GNU_GETTEXT will not change. The other one may change.

> Anyway, I will use _LIBINTL_H and resend appropiate patches for
> DJGPP's CVS tree.

Thanks.

> If you prefer something different, it will be ok for me as long
> as your solution DTRT.

I hope the solution I put in - based on yours - does the right thing;
I didn't test it.

Bruno