Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 22:45:56 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id: <2950-Wed07Mar2001224555+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEFKCBAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject: Re: stubify and Windows ME
References:  <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEFKCBAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:51:13 +0100
> 
> > It looks like stubify has problems on Windows ME as well: it triggers 
> > EINVAL when invoked by GCC as part of linking.  It sounds like another 
> > problem with _rename, but unlike Windows 2000, the absence of the target 
> > file doesn't prevent the problem from happening, or so it seems (from 
> > what one user told me).
> How is it invoked exactly?

It was invoked by GCC, so the answer is in the specs file.