Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 13:03:50 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Bash problem with SFN
In-Reply-To: <200103061033.LAA03856@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010306130244.9267A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 6 Mar 101, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> > Does Bash support completion of environment variables on Unix?
> 
> Yes. (Although the version I had easy access to is 1.14.6.)

Well, I actually wanted to know about 2.04.  If it does complete on 
environment variables on Unix, why is it a Bad Thing to have that support 
on DOS/Windows?