Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 00:19:06 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org
Message-Id: <2110-Sun04Mar2001001905+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, bill AT taniwha DOT org
In-reply-to: <20010303143222.A11337@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT
	Williams on Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:32:22 -0600)
Subject: Re: djasm patch #5
References: <20010301154709 DOT B8889 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <2593-Fri02Mar2001121352+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010302082021 DOT C9404 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <200103030244 DOT VAA31634 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010303143222 DOT A11337 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:32:22 -0600
> From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
> 
> Bill, you initially implemented sh[lr]d in `stock' djasm.y for
> the following double-precision shifts:
> 
> sh[lr]d reg16, reg16, const
> sh[lr]d reg16, reg16, reg8
> sh[lr]d reg32, reg32, const
> sh[lr]d reg32, reg32, reg8
> 
> (This is only half of the available double-precision shifts,
> but these are the only ones you implemented.)
> 
> Then, you later (in your hacked version of djasm.y, never distributed
> with DJGPP) redefined sh[lr]d to be consistent with the other mnemonics,
> introduced new mnemonics for the double-precision shift operations, and
> implemented all 8 forms of the instruction.

Are you saying that djasm with sh[lr]d support was never distributed
or made available via CVS?  If so, there's no need to provide any
back-compatibility options.