Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:12:30 -0700
From: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: djasm patch #5
Message-ID: <20010302231230.B18389@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010301154709 DOT B8889 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <2593-Fri02Mar2001121352+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010302082021 DOT C9404 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <20010302082021.C9404@kendall.sfbr.org>; from jeffw@darwin.sfbr.org on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:20:21AM -0600
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:20:21AM -0600, JT Williams wrote:
> DJ, can you recall if you implemented the double-precision shift
> in djasm because you actually used it in a specific application?

DJ didn't implement them: I did. He applied the patch for me :)

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak