X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:02:04 -0600 From: JT Williams To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: DJGPP specific patch for libiconv-1.5.1 Message-ID: <20010226130204.A4122@kendall.sfbr.org> Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <15002 DOT 28215 DOT 961848 DOT 395747 AT honolulu DOT ilog DOT fr> <15002 DOT 41851 DOT 731838 DOT 645310 AT honolulu DOT ilog DOT fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15002.41851.731838.645310@honolulu.ilog.fr>; from haible@ilog.fr on Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 07:42:03PM +0100 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk -: > Admittedly, there are particularly many "problem files" in libiconv, so -: > there would be some work involved -: -: It is not about the amount of work. It is about the information it -: conveys. "mail-2001-02-26-libiconv-vanHolder" conveys more information -: than "mail0237". Obviously you do not want to discard information. But the information in an LFN can also be contained by using additional directories and an SFN.