Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 10:11:34 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De Message-Id: <2110-Sat24Feb2001101134+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6 CC: haible AT ilog DOT fr, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <2D624415A1C@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de> (ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De) Subject: Re: gettext pretest available References: <2D624415A1C AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" > Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:30:48 +0200 > > > > *** gettext-2001-02-05.orig/djgpp/config.sed Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 > > > --- gettext-2001-02-05/djgpp/config.sed Fri Feb 16 18:12:28 2001 > > > *************** > > > *** 0 **** > > [snip] > > > + s,\\.old\\.,_old.,g\ > > > + s,\\.tab\\.c,_tab.c,g\ > > > + s,\\.tab\\.h,_tab.h,g\ > > > + s,gettext-1,gettext.1,g\ > > > + s,gettext-2,gettext.2,g\ > > > + s,msgcmp-1,msgcmp.1,g\ > > > + s,msgcmp-2,msgcmp.2,g\ > > > > Shouldn't this use fnchange.lst file instead of repeating the same > > conversions twice in two different places? > > fnchange.lst is used to rename the files during extraction. config.sed > is used to modify the configure script. This modified configure script > will create a DJGPP suitable makefile. Both conversions are need. I know, but that's not what I meant. What I wanted to say is that in both cases, the same files are renamed. So it might be a good idea to have the list of renamings in one place, instead of maintaining two separate lists. Two lists might get out of sync. For example, you could produce config.sed and fnchange.lst from one master copy of the file-name changes. Or you could produce fnchange.lst by editing config.sed.