Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 10:11:02 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De
Message-Id: <8011-Fri23Feb2001101102+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, haible AT ilog DOT fr
In-reply-to: <2BDF13E1437@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
	(ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De)
Subject: Re: DJGPP specific patch for libiconv-1.5.1
References:  <2BDF13E1437 AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero" <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
> Organization: Darmstadt University of Technology
> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 23:19:15 +0200
> 
>           (usage) [O_BINARY]: Print --binary option.

I probably missed this when I read your previous set of patches.

Why is the --binary option needed?  Why cannot the files be always
read and written in binary mode?