Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:59:32 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Juan Manuel Guerrero <ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Bruno Haible <haible AT ilog DOT fr>
Subject: Re: gettext pretest available
In-Reply-To: <2A29E765EBE@HRZ1.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010222095908.1660E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:

In a ChangeLog entry, if a change is conditioned by a preprocessing
symbol, the name of that symbol should appear before the colon, not
after it.  This is correct:

> 	* gettextP.h [O_BINARY]: New macros READ, WRITE,

But this is not:

> 	* libgnuintl.h: [DJGPP] Resolve function name collision.

> *** gettext-2001-02-05.orig/djgpp/config.sed	Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
> --- gettext-2001-02-05/djgpp/config.sed	Fri Feb 16 18:12:28 2001
> ***************
> *** 0 ****
[snip]
> +   s,\\.old\\.,_old.,g\
> +   s,\\.tab\\.c,_tab.c,g\
> +   s,\\.tab\\.h,_tab.h,g\
> +   s,gettext-1,gettext.1,g\
> +   s,gettext-2,gettext.2,g\
> +   s,msgcmp-1,msgcmp.1,g\
> +   s,msgcmp-2,msgcmp.2,g\

Shouldn't this use fnchange.lst file instead of repeating the same
conversions twice in two different places?