Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:29:02 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id: <3791-Sun18Feb2001222902+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A8FCC18.8337.2AB3C6@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: possible objcopy problem.
References: <3A8CF9FC DOT 21062 DOT 9A92D AT localhost> (snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com) <3A8FCC18 DOT 8337 DOT 2AB3C6 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 13:20:24 -0500
> 
> The output arch. is set the input arch when copying. But since 'binary' 
> usually doesn't have an arch. for BFD to catch on to, a warning message is 
> output.

But doesn't coff-go32 identify the output architecture unambiguously?