Message-ID: <20010215131233.1016.qmail@lauras.lt> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:12:33 +0200 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3 Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <20010214152545 DOT 933 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: ; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:03:13PM +0200 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > And why not to implement it once correctly (read: to be compatible with libc++) > > later? > > I was under an impression that this was impossible, since the exact > details of the libstdc++'s implementation are not clear enough at this > time. But this is exactly the same I wanted to tell - fix headers when it is clear how they should be fixed (i.e. libstdc++ v3.0 is released, or its developers clearly describe, how this should be done). Laurynas