Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:03:13 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
In-Reply-To: <20010214152545.933.qmail@lauras.lt>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010215130253.27892B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > Would it make sense to ask Stephen to continue sending changes for the
> > headers and commit them, and leave the issue of libstdc++ interaction
> > for later?  Backing up changes is easy with CVS, if we need to do that
> > later.
> 
> And why not to implement it once correctly (read: to be compatible with libc++)
> later?

I was under an impression that this was impossible, since the exact
details of the libstdc++'s implementation are not clear enough at this
time.