Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:26:04 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
In-Reply-To: <20010212204049.1165.qmail@lauras.lt>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010213092537.25782J-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> There are three C header strategies implemented in libstdc++-v3:
> 1) c. This one does nothing - it leaves headers as is, like in V2.
> 2) c_std. This one is default for now. It includes C headers in 
> global namespace and pulls standard functions into std namespace.
> 3) c_shadow. This is WIP and is intended to become default in future.
> And this is the one Stephen was talking about - namespace _C_legacy,
> etc.

Are you talking about the <*.h> headers or the <c*> headers?
I understand that Stephen was working on allowing C++ programs to
include the <*.h> headers.