Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:18:42 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-Id: <5567-Mon12Feb2001221842+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010212191413.442.qmail@lauras.lt>
Subject: Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
References: <20010212160930 DOT 507 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <2110-Mon12Feb2001210139+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010212191413 DOT 442 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:14:13 +0200
> 
> > Does it mean
> > that non-standard functions will be available in the global namespace?
> 
> Yes. In fact, everything is available in the global namespace, and
> standard functions are put in namespace std.

Then Stephen misunderstood what the libstdc++ wrappers do?  Or did he
use a stale version?