Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:20:26 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id: <2950-Sun11Feb2001212026+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3A869A94.21992.A30702@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject: Re: posix/fcntl/fcntl.c
References:  <3A869A94 DOT 21992 DOT A30702 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:58:44 -0500
> 
> > Didn't a comment disappear from posix/fcntl/fcntl.c with recent(?)
> > changes.
> 
> Looks that way. If there are no objections, I'll add two comments to fcntl.c:

Obviously, I don't have any objections, but shouldn't we be able to
actually make those FIXMEs happen, once Martin's changes go in?

> 
> Index: fcntl.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/libc/posix/fcntl/fcntl.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.5
> diff -c -p -r1.5 fcntl.c
> *** fcntl.c	2001/02/01 19:19:24	1.5
> --- fcntl.c	2001/02/11 18:43:51
> *************** fcntl(int fd, int cmd, ...)
> *** 408,419 ****
> --- 408,421 ----
>   
>       case F_GETFL:
>       {
> +       /* FIXME: Return O_APPEND and O_ACCMODE flags.  */
>         return 0;
>       }
>   
>   
>       case F_SETFL:
>       {
> +       /* FIXME: Set O_APPEND and O_ACCMODE flags.  */
>         unsigned char new_mode_bits;
>   
>   
> 
>